Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags

AlexanderHertliegen

6
Posts
A member registered Apr 09, 2020

Recent community posts

Good evening friend, I see that you continue to insist on answering a reply that is perfectly justified, and seems not to understand how programmers and beta testers work, and to teach it, see it as a kind of kitchen critic, in the same way that testers work of programs and sotware. How does this work? It is simple, we test on wide range computers, from the minimum to the maximum, from the graphical development computers to the development and calculation computers. YOUR program DID NOT pass the tests, and it was done with various environments, because they conflict, the size of your program does NOT justify its performance. I don't know if this does NOT seem clear enough to you. And these tests are sent online, not through mockery or sarcasm as you want to minimize. The quality of your product is POOR. Low, minimum, with conflicts and bugs in the program. You can be offended as much as you want, that is the reality of things and if I don't do it, someone else will also do it and can try to discredit, but the result will remain the same, and the failure is not of the program itself but because of it. seen from the programmer. That you take the trouble to use an illogical, irreverent and even humorous argument shows your level of maturity regarding the development of your project and only confirms my results, that they do not seem to you is not my issue, because I am not a psychologist but a programmer BETA tester, understand? And you can do the ironies you want if other investors ask me to make an evaluation of your project they can reach the same conclusion and people have the right to see the quality of the product that is being offered to them. If it is a prototype, you must notify: it is a prototype with errors. But you did not do such a thing, and still offer it as a complete product, what is that called? at the criminal and legal level it is called fraud. Take responsibility for the quality of your program and dedicate yourself to programming better than you criticize. Unlike you if I have to demonstrate my credentials, contact my private, by mail, I will gladly pass the supervision office and I will gladly tell you about the failures of your program Line by line. If not, do not waste time answering this criticism with malicious words because doing so discredits you and gives me reason. The best friend, is that you correct the errors of your project and undertake a new development. Bethesda Software Company did the same as you in a larger size using 768 mb, how do you justify that your program spends 3 gb and is so mediocre? Laugh whatever you want, the facts are the facts, and the clowns are others, not the testers. Greetings and blessings. Ing. Alexyz Hertliegen

Good evening friend, I see that you continue to insist on answering a reply that is perfectly justified, and seems not to understand how programmers and beta testers work, and to teach it, see it as a kind of kitchen critic, in the same way that testers work of programs and sotware. How does this work? It is simple, we test on wide range computers, from the minimum to the maximum, from the graphical development computers to the development and calculation computers. YOUR program DID NOT pass the tests, and it was done with various environments, because they conflict, the size of your program does NOT justify its performance. I don't know if this does NOT seem clear enough to you. And these tests are sent online, not through mockery or sarcasm as you want to minimize. The quality of your product is POOR. Low, minimum, with conflicts and bugs in the program. You can be offended as much as you want, that is the reality of things and if I don't do it, someone else will also do it and can try to discredit, but the result will remain the same, and the failure is not of the program itself but because of it. seen from the programmer. That you take the trouble to use an illogical, irreverent and even humorous argument shows your level of maturity regarding the development of your project and only confirms my results, that they do not seem to you is not my issue, because I am not a psychologist but a programmer BETA tester, understand? And you can do the ironies you want if other investors ask me to make an evaluation of your project they can reach the same conclusion and people have the right to see the quality of the product that is being offered to them. If it is a prototype, you must notify: it is a prototype with errors. But you did not do such a thing, and still offer it as a complete product, what is that called? at the criminal and legal level it is called fraud. Take responsibility for the quality of your program and dedicate yourself to programming better than you criticize. Unlike you if I have to demonstrate my credentials, contact my private, by mail, I will gladly pass the supervision office and I will gladly tell you about the failures of your program Line by line. If not, do not waste time answering this criticism with malicious words because doing so discredits you and gives me reason. The best friend, is that you correct the errors of your project and undertake a new development. Bethesda Software Company did the same as you in a larger size using 768 mb, how do you justify that your program spends 3 gb and is so mediocre? Laugh whatever you want, the facts are the facts, and the clowns are others, not the testers. Greetings and blessings. Ing. Alexyz Hertliegen

Good evening friend, I see that you continue to insist on answering a reply that is perfectly justified, and seems not to understand how programmers and beta testers work, and to teach it, see it as a kind of kitchen critic, in the same way that testers work of programs and sotware. How does this work? It is simple, we test on wide range computers, from the minimum to the maximum, from the graphical development computers to the development and calculation computers. YOUR program DID NOT pass the tests, and it was done with various environments, because they conflict, the size of your program does NOT justify its performance. I don't know if this does NOT seem clear enough to you. And these tests are sent online, not through mockery or sarcasm as you want to minimize. The quality of your product is POOR. Low, minimum, with conflicts and bugs in the program. You can be offended as much as you want, that is the reality of things and if I don't do it, someone else will also do it and can try to discredit, but the result will remain the same, and the failure is not of the program itself but because of it. seen from the programmer. That you take the trouble to use an illogical, irreverent and even humorous argument shows your level of maturity regarding the development of your project and only confirms my results, that they do not seem to you is not my issue, because I am not a psychologist but a programmer BETA tester, understand? And you can do the ironies you want if other investors ask me to make an evaluation of your project they can reach the same conclusion and people have the right to see the quality of the product that is being offered to them. If it is a prototype, you must notify: it is a prototype with errors. But you did not do such a thing, and still offer it as a complete product, what is that called? at the criminal and legal level it is called fraud. Take responsibility for the quality of your program and dedicate yourself to programming better than you criticize. Unlike you if I have to demonstrate my credentials, contact my private, by mail, I will gladly pass the supervision office and I will gladly tell you about the failures of your program Line by line. If not, do not waste time answering this criticism with malicious words because doing so discredits you and gives me reason. The best friend, is that you correct the errors of your project and undertake a new development. Bethesda Software Company did the same as you in a larger size using 768 mb, how do you justify that your program spends 3 gb and is so mediocre? Laugh whatever you want, the facts are the facts, and the clowns are others, not the testers. Greetings and blessings. Ing. Alexyz Hertliegen

Ok friend, I have noticed that you have written 2 times trying to argue my vote and my opinion regarding your program, let me clarify that I will not change my vote for the following reasons: first, my computer has its 8 cores released, it uses the operating system updated and I have more than 16 Gb of RAM, so I see that your program does NOT work correctly on a device that is designed to run it. So, I have previously evaluated other programs of the same quality that consume less resources and perform more efficiently.
If you want to evaluate my credentials for SUN Microsystems, I will gladly provide you with my data, because as I mentioned, I have been working in the field of programs and applications for 11 years, and I have a master's degree in programming and computing from the University. If I want to reserve my anonymity, it is for personal tranquility and comfort, but if you feel threatened by my criticism you can ignore it and continue developing your project, even so, if you DO NOT correct the errors in your program, my rating will remain exactly the same And if you are in this environment it is for you to do evaluations of your program, correct? then, either you correct the errors or else support the evaluation. But if you do not accept the evaluations it is your business, I only warn other users of the poor quality of your product, because I remind you that if you present this on a commercial level, you are selling a fraud. Have I been clear? So please stop the comments and dedicate yourself to correcting your program or increasing efficiency. They are my best wishes to you. Atte, Ing. Alexander Hetliegen

T

Thanks for replying, hopefully as well as taking the time to reply you can correct the program errors. On this same page I have tried other games with superior graphic qualities and they do not have such poor performance. But let's see the evidence, do you think? 
My pc's characteristics are: CPU, Intel core i7, Graphics: Nvidia Geforce GTX (8 gb of capacity) 12 Gb of RAM, Screen with 17,3 inches, FHD 1920 x 1980 . I am a beta tester of anothe companies with theis software,  by eleven (11) years. So, pal, I made many tests with another pc's or hardare, with more or less  requirementes for some games. Ypu eors es very poor. Greeting to yoy   
I have some suggestions to the designer: the game is playable in medium quality but ... the boot texts are too small, the visual quality is too heavy to run, it has too many loading screens and needless to say, the modules. I know that there are companies that have dedicated departments for that, but compared to other games, I have seen games that consume less resources and equal, even exceed graphic quality. Sometimes It is not necessary to be so thorough with the visual details, if you are looking for quality in the performance. 5 stars I would only give 2.5. (Take as a reference a certain game called "Oblivion". With 768 mb it had an unbeatable graphic quality for pc's whose standard was hardly 2 gb). I don't justify 1gb for such slow development, and define it just as "acceptable". Much performance improvement is needed.